REVIEW

Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Compared to Microscopic and Uniportal Approaches in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: evidence from 25 studies

Eficácia e Segurança da Endoscopia Biportal Unilateral em Comparação com Abordagens Microscópicas e Uniportais na Estenose Lombar: evidências de 25 estudos

  • Franz Jooji Onishi    Franz Jooji Onishi
  • Alberto Oliveira    Alberto Oliveira
  • Fabio Veiga de Castro Sparapani    Fabio Veiga de Castro Sparapani
  • Sérgio Cavalheiro    Sérgio Cavalheiro
  Views: 68
  Downloads: 7

Resumo

Introdução: A estenose lombar (LSS) é uma condição degenerativa comum em idosos, frequentemente exigindo descompressão cirúrgica. Abordagens minimamente invasivas endoscópicas têm recebido atenção pelo potencial de reduzir o dano aos tecidos moles e melhorar a recuperação. Métodos: Foram incluídos estudos comparativos: UBE, endoscopia uniportal e descompressão microscópica para o tratamento da estenose lombar. Os desfechos de melhora clínica e complicações foram analisados. Resultados: Foram incluídos 25 estudos, totalizando 3.496 pacientes. A UBE apresentou melhora significativamente maior no ODI (p = 0,00001), menor perda sanguínea intraoperatória e menor tempo de internação. A satisfação dos pacientes também foi maior no grupo UBE em relação à cirurgia microscópica (p = 0,004). Quando comparada à endoscopia uniportal, a UBE apresentou resultados semelhantes em ODI, EVA, tempo cirúrgico e satisfação. Conclusões: A UBE proporciona resultados clínicos semelhantes ou superiores à endoscopia uniportal e à descompressão microscópica em termos de melhora funcional, mantendo perfil de segurança equivalente. Contudo, considerando a relativa novidade da UBE e a concentração de estudos favoráveis em centros de alto volume, deve-se ponderar a possibilidade de viés de publicação e comercial.

Palavras-chave

Estenose lombar; Endoscopia biportal unilateral; Cirurgia endoscópica da coluna; Descompressão microscópica;

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a prevalent degenerative disorder in the elderly, frequently necessitating surgical decompression. Microscopic decompression has long been established, but minimally invasive approaches, including monoportal and unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE), are increasingly utilized for their potential to limit tissue damage and enhance recovery. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of UBE with monoportal and microscopic techniques. Methods: Eligible studies compared at least two techniques — UBE, monoportal endoscopy, or microscopic decompression — for LSS. Outcomes assessed included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, patient satisfaction, reoperation rates, and complications (dural tears, infections, hematomas, neural injury). Protocol: PROSPERO (CRD420251079604). Results: Twenty-five studies with 3,496 patients were included. Compared with microscopic surgery, UBE yielded greater ODI improvement (p = 0.00001), less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and higher satisfaction (p = 0.004). Versus monoportal endoscopy, UBE showed similar ODI, VAS, operative time, and satisfaction, but greater blood loss and slightly longer hospitalization. Conclusions: UBE provides outcomes equal to or superior to monoportal and microscopic decompression with comparable safety. Nonetheless, evidence may reflect publication or institutional bias, highlighting the need for high-quality randomized trials with transparent conflict-of-interest reporting.

Keywords

Lumbar spinal stenosis; Unilateral biportal endoscopy; Endoscopic spine surgery; Microscopic decompression; Minimally invasive spine surgery; Systematic review

References

1. Park DK, Weng C, Zakko P, Choi DJ. Unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023;13(2). http://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00020. PMid:38274147.

2. Pao JL. A review of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(Suppl 3):S65-71. http://doi.org/10.14444/8165. PMid:35027470.

3. Meng H, Su N, Lin J, Fei Q. Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy and micro-endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):814. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-02304322-2. PMid:37907922.

4. Zhuang HX, Guo SJ, Meng H, Lin JS, Yang Y, Fei Q. Unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(11):4998-5012. http://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202306_32617. PMid:37318474.

5. Li K, Zhang Z, Ran J, Ma L, Meng X. Unilateral Endoscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg. 2025;12:1585783. http://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1585783. PMid:40589530.

6. Dou C, Yu Q, Zhang W, Ma L, Meng X. Comparison of Biportal Endoscopic Technique and Conventional Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) for multi-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly people. Orthop Surg. 2025;17(8):2302-12. http://doi.org/10.1111/os.70084. PMid:40528425.

7. Chen Z, Zhou H, Wang X, Liu Z, Liu W, Luo J. Complications of unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2023;170:e371-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.019. PMid:36368457.

8. Ju CI, Lee SM. Complications and management of endoscopic spinal surgery. Neurospine. 2023;20(1):56-77. http://doi.org/10.14245/ ns.2346226.113. PMid:37016854.

9. Aygun H, Abdulshafi K. Unilateral biportal endoscopy versus tubular microendoscopy in management of single level degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective study. Clin Spine Surg. 2021;34(6):E323-8. http://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001122. PMid:33470660.

10. Baoshan X, Haiwei X, Ning L, et al. Comparative study of unilateral double-channel endoscopy and coaxial large-channel endoscopy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Chin Med J.

[Internet]. 2022 [Accessed: 7/8/2025];102(41). Available from: https:// www.scholarmate.com/S/Cv2Omz

11. Cheng X, Wu Y, Chen B, Tang J. A comparative study of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression for geriatric patients with lumbar lateral recess stenosis. J Pain Res. 2023;16:2241-9. http://doi.org/10.2147/ JPR.S413502. PMid:37409162.

12. Eun DC, Lee YH, Park JO, et al. A comparative analysis of bi-portal endoscopic spine surgery and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in multilevel lumbar stenosis patients. J Clin Med. 2023;12(3):1033. http://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031033. PMid:36769686.

13. Han G, Ma L, Cheng Y, et al. Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and uniportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Chin J Reparative Reconstr Surg. 2024;38(3):324-30. [In Chinese]. http://doi.org/10.7507/10021892.202312029. PMid:38500426.

14. Wang S, Xu H, Ni W, Huang Q, Wang X. Unilateral versus bilateral balloon kyphoplasty in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Medicine. 2020;99(25):e20524. http://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020524. PMid:32569172.

15. He BL, Zhu ZC, Lin LQ, et al. Biportal versus uniportal endoscopic technique in Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis. Asian J Surg. 2024;47(1):112-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.05.068. PMid:37331857.

16. Heo DH, Son SK, Eum JH, Park CK. Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique: technical note and preliminary clinical results. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;43(2):E8. http://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17146. PMid:28760038.

17. Lee MH, Jang HJ, Moon BJ, et al. Comparative outcomes of biportal endoscopic decompression, conventional subtotal laminectomy, and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar central stenosis. Neurospine. 2024;21(4):1178-89. http:// doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448830.415. PMid:39765263.

18. Min WK, Kim JE, Choi DJ, Park EJ, Heo J. Clinical and radiological outcomes between biportal endoscopic decompression and microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop Sci. 2020;25(3):371-8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2019.05.022. PMid:31255456.

19. Ouyang JY, Yang QY, Chen LL, et al. A comparative analysis of unilateral biportal endoscopic and open laminectomy in multilevel lumbar stenosis. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1409088. http://doi.org/10.3389/ fneur.2024.1409088. PMid:39777310.

20. Qing P, Guo W, Xie S, et al. Clinical efficacy of one-hole split endoscopy vs. unilateral biportal endoscopy for the treatment of single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up. Front Surg. 2025;12:1495741. http://doi.org/10.3389/ fsurg.2025.1495741. PMid:40040816.

21. Sun H, Zhang Q, Xu K, et al. A retrospective study on safety and clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique for spinal degenerative diseases. PeerJ. 2025;13:e19076. http://doi.org/10.7717/ peerj.19076. PMid:40191755.

22. Tan B, Yang QY, Fan B, Xiong C. Decompression via unilateral biportal endoscopy for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A comparative study with decompression via open discectomy. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1132698. http://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1132698. PMid:36908592.

23. Wei R, Liu W, Yu M, et al. Delta large-channel endoscopy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg. 2025;20(1):10. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05409-0. PMid:39754230.

24. Zhou S, A J, Xu X, et al. Comparison of surgical invasiveness and hidden blood loss between unilateral double portal endoscopic lumbar disc extraction and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024;19(1):778. http:// doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05274-x. PMid:39567947.

25. Choi DJ, Kim JE, Jung JT, et al. Biportal endoscopic spine surgery for various foraminal lesions at the lumbosacral lesion. Asian Spine J. 2018;12(3):569-73. http://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.569. PMid:29879787.

26. Ito Z, Shibayama M, Nakamura S, et al. Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic laminectomy versus microendoscopic laminectomy for single-level laminectomy: a single-center, retrospective analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021;148:e581-8. http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.031. PMid:33476779.

27. Kang T, Park SY, Kang CH, Lee SH, Park JH, Suh SW. Is biportal technique/endoscopic spinal surgery satisfactory for lumbar spinal stenosis patients?: A prospective randomized comparative study. Medicine. 2019;98(18):e15451. http://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015451. PMid:31045817.

28. Kim SK, Kang SS, Hong YH, Park SW, Lee SC. Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique versus open microdiscectomy for single-level lumbar discectomy: a multicenter, retrospective analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):22. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-0180725-1. PMid:29386033.

29. Kim HS, Choi SH, Shim DM, Lee IS, Oh YK, Woo YH. Advantages of new endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) over conventional microscopic ULBD. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020;12(3):330-6. http://doi.org/10.4055/cios19136. PMid:32904063.

30. Lee HG, Kang MS, Kim SY, et al. Dural injury in unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery. Global Spine J. 2021;11(6):845-51. http:// doi.org/10.1177/2192568220941446. PMid:32762357.

31. McGrath LB, White-Dzuro GA, Hofstetter CP. Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(4):491-9. http://doi.org/10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18689. PMid:30641853.

32. Rieger B, Sitoci-Ficici KH, Reinshagen C, et al. Endoscopic and microscopic segmental decompression via translaminar crossover spinal approach in elderly patients. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:e361-71. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.078. PMid:30703594.

33. Park MK, Park SA, Son SK, Park WW, Choi SH. Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up. Neurosurg Rev. 2019;42(3):753-61. http://doi.org/10.1007/ s10143-019-01114-3. PMid:31144195.

34. Pao JL, Lin SM, Chen WC, Chang CH. Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. J Spine Surg. 2020;6(2):438-46. http://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2020.03.08. PMid:32656381.

35. Tang Z, Tan J, Shen M, Yang H. Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal and percutaneous endoscopic techniques in unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):713. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12891024-07825-z. PMid:39237948.

36. Ding H, Han X, Xing Y, Liu Y, He D, Han X. Clinical and radiological comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic and percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of lumbar spinal degenerative disease. Orthop Surg. 2025;17(4):1105-13. http:// doi.org/10.1111/os.14361. PMid:39854041.

37. Pao JL. Preliminary clinical and radiological outcomes of the “no-punch” decompression techniques for unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery. Neurospine. 2024;21(2):732-41. http://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448376.188. PMid:38955542.

38. Ross N, Aleman C, Dhenin A, Vassal M, Lonjon G. Tubular versus unilateral biportal endoscopy: MRI analysis after unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2025;34(7):2972-80. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08953-3. PMid:40448852.

39. Kalanchiam GP, Kaliya-Perumal AK, Sampath L, Boey ETH, Oh JYL. Complications in uniportal vs unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a scoping review. Global Spine J. 2025;30:21925682251346413. http://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251346413. PMid:40448305.

40. Xie Y, Gu H, Yongcun W, et al. A comparison between accurate unilateral puncture paths planned by preoperative and conventional unilateral puncture techniques in percutaneous vertebroplasty. Comput Math Methods Med.

2022;2022:6762530. http://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6762530. PMid:35832135.

41. Li YS, Chen CM, Hsu CJ, Yao ZK. Complications of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2022;168:359-368.e2. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.038.

PMid:36527215.



1Department of Neurosurgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – Unifesp, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

 

Received Aug 11, 2025

Accepted Aug 15, 2025


JBNC  Brazilian Journal of Neurosurgery

JBNC
  •   ISSN (print version): 0103-5118
  •   e-ISSN (online version): 2446-6786
iThenticate
Open Access

Contact

Social Media

   

ABNc  Academia Brasileira de Neurocirurgia

  •   Rua da Quitanda 159 – 10º andar - Centro - CEP 20091-005 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ
  •   +55 21 2233.0323
  •    abnc@abnc.org.br

Sponsor

  • Brain4Care
  • Hospital INC
  • Strattner
  • Zeiss